RIP RIM – BlackBerry a Thing of the Past?

As of the 9th of August, 2012, veteran smartphone manufacturer RIM has come forward and admitted that it is unable to survive in a world dominated by companies “who crank out 60 handsets a year”.

RIM CEO Thorsten Heins told The Telegraph that allowing other original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to create devices which use the BlackBerry operating system may be the only way that the company is able to stay afloat. As many know already, RIM has always been resistant in allowing its OS to be used on non-BlackBerry hardware. RIM may be able to see more profits by licensing outside hardware companies such as Samsung or HTC to use the OS. The problem would be that many of the larger phone makers already pay hefty fees to Microsoft for licenses to Windows Phone 7/8, and OEMs also pay Microsoft for patents to use Android, along with Google charging nothing for the licensing fee, they may not see the attraction in paying a hefty price for a BB license.

There was some talk of Samsung’s interest in purchasing RIM which actually ran up their share price quite a lot. Samsung ended up having to release a statement clarifying that it had zero interest in the matter. I don’t know about you readers but I can easily come up with a few names that Samsung may have given to their first BB10 device: Samsung BlackBerry X (with X being 10), Samsung BlackBerry S (SII, SIII etc), Samsung Galaxy BB, The BlackBerry Note; you get the picture.

IBM has expressed interest in RIM’s enterprise aspect which includes RIM’s famed secure push email. IBM is the largest provider of all things which have the words “service”, “computer” and “enterprise” in its description. Although this does not foreshadow anything like a “ThinkPhone” or “ThinkBerry”, it does give RIM a slight leg-up in some desperate restructuring. However, if the majority of profits do come from the customer, then flogging what’s under the hood to a behind the scenes company will do nothing to improve their slowing product. First things first, they really need to get BB10 out of door faster.

Simply put, RIM is losing its grasp on the smartphone market as its handsets simply do not inspire or excite anymore for many reasons:

1 – Coverage. Unlike Apple who loves the spotlight and Microsoft who look for every opportunity to attempt to show that they are still the best (to an extent, successfully might I add, with Windows Phone 8), BlackBerry has had less coverage at its Keynote Summits and Conferences. There is no build up and therefore, no one queues outside the Carphone Warehouse at 4am to get the newest BlackBerry.

2 – Target. Yes we all know that BlackBerrys are phones for the business type but they are still smartphones and they do many other things; there are even Twitter and Facebook apps for BB OS. The problem is that RIM has never really pushed their devices for anything other the enterprise market.

3 – Same-ol’ same-ol’. RIM has gone the safe route of making almost every BlackBerry look the same for about a decade. There have been a few breakaways such as with the abomination that was the Storm series (BlackBerry’s revolutionary phone with both touch and press in the same screen), and the Torch series that was decent but no game changer.

The most loyal of BlackBerry users all claim that they cannot live without BlackBerry Messenger (BBM), RIM’s dedicated chat app that allows free inter-BlackBerry communication for free anywhere in the world as long as there is an Internet connection. Apple caught onto this and followed suit by implementing iMessage into iOS as well as Mac OS X. No doubt Windows Phone 8 will have something similar such as Windows/MSN messenger.

The smartphone nowadays is the portal for all things social. The smartphone also carries an amount of street cred amongst your peers and BlackBerry is losing that due to some of the reasons mentioned above. Products like newly released iPhones, Samsungs, HTCs and Nokia’s latest offerings such as the N9, PureView 808 and Lumia line have always been excitedly received whereas a new BlackBerry model would be lucky to get anything more than a “That’s cool”. It also doesn’t make sense having a smartphone where one of its features which allows you to save money/allowance is incompatible with the phones of the people you communicate with the most.

An anecdotal finish – I hung out with a local cricket club one afternoon taking pictures with my new DSLR and during their match, I had the responsibility of the valuables bag, to which I performed a little brand-count. Of the 12 players, 6 owned an iPhone of some sort, 3 owned an Android device, 2 dumbphones and only a single BlackBerry. I brought this up after the match and the owner told me that he had been a loyal user of BlackBerry for many years but began to see the attraction of other phones as well as BBM losing its usefulness and when the time came for an upgrade, RIM will have lost another user.

RIM needs to get its feet under the ground and push its products harder. With behind the scenes backing from IBM, as well as an OEM or two, it can be back on its feet in no time and proving to the world that the market stoll needn’t only contain one type of fruit. If RIM wishes to still keep its enterprise image, I would honestly look forward to a BlackBerry device made by Dell or HP…think about it, The BlackBerry XPS or The BlackBerry Envy. Maybe.

We wouldn’t have Romney, so why would they?

As Romney takes his campaign overseas for the first time, his behaviour alongside his campaign history highlights aspects of not just Republican politics, but American politics as a whole that would seem completely alien to those in the UK.

If you’re a resident of the United Kingdom (or perhaps anywhere that isn’t the USA) you might have been aware of the Republican frontman’s undiplomatic doubts about Britain and its ability to host the Olympics, just a day before the Opening Ceremony was to begin. Far from being the end of the world, or even his campaign for that matter, the implications, reactions and reasons revolving this apparent ‘blunder’ say more about the alien world of American politics than possibly anything in recent memory. So the question is, if we’ve heard so much of his ‘gaffes’, why aren’t we declaring Obama the victor already?

First of all, it’s important to remember that despite the UK tabloid’s ferocious attacks, or the London Mayor’s mockery, the USA (and largely the world) has really struggled to give a shit. To put it into perspective, the man on his first campaign trip abroad couldn’t even get our country’s name right, calling it England – the virtual equivalent of calling the United States ‘Texas’. But why? Surely the man challenging the incumbent for the post of “Leader of the Free World” shouldn’t be pissing off its ‘greatest ally’ on his first trip to meet and greet? Breaking news, if anything – his Olympics ‘gaffe’ only made his journey to the White House an easier one. No, I’m not even joking. Take a look at the video below to see what I’m talking about, pay attention to the penultimate reason specifically.

To an average Brit, the denouncing of an ally’s Olympic opening ceremony tied with the inability to remember their name would almost run them out of town. Being perceived as unprofessional and incompetent, the British press and electorate would jump on them like a rabid dog. Granted, the video example is a little white trash, a little far-right and a little… well, bonkers (“we don’t know where he comes from” – try America). But in reality it says a sizable amount not just about American priorities, but staunch Republican values – y’know, the values that will probably see him carried into the White House. To hard-line Conservatives, this is America at its best – crass, proud and uncaring. The American right cares little for nitty-gritty foreign policy and the concerns of other sovereign nations, if anything their only priority is parading around American exceptionalism wherever they can, proving still that the United States is No.1, and more importantly always will be.

Perhaps unsurprisingly so, as this election (unlike those of the Bush era) will be the most distant from foreign policy there have been in recent memory. Struggling with a troubled economy, the already insular American public and media have become ever more focused on their domestic financial problems, healthcare controversy and gas prices (often a symbol of freedom in the vast landscape of the USA).

But if your first impressions of the American political landscape were an electorate tolerant (even accepting) of incompetence, you’re still not completely wrong.

Mitt Romney has proved himself to flip-flop on vital issues to the American public and his Conservative supporters, not just once, but time and time again. Vietnam, stem cell research, Reagan (something of a Conservative hero), abortion, ‘Obamacare’ (a system he originally instituted in his state of Massachusetts, now promising to repeal nationwide if he were to win), even small and apparently meaningless facts. At best, he has a memory disorder, at worst he’s a desperate unempathetic suit who’ll say just about anything to get in the White House. Just a quick reminder, this is the man who’ll control the biggest nuclear arsenal in the world, have the strongest diplomatic clout and head the world’s only superpower. Question is, do the American public (more specifically the ones who’ll be voting for him) even know of his flip-flop endeavors? Chances not.

Unlike the UK, the United States has news coverage that quite obviously favours one political view over another. Fox, despite its ability to perpetuate an array of quality American films and entertainment around the globe, has possibly the most biased news network in the Western world. But unlike the rest of us, America simultaneously sees Fox as the second most trusted news network in the country whilst also being the top untrusted network too. This alone is a testament to just how divisive their news coverage is. Most revealing of all is the political affiliations of those who trusted, and those who did not trust the station.

A TV News Poll by Public Polling Policy revealed 72% of Conservatives trusted the Fox News coverage, while 82% of Liberals didn’t. And considering that Fox has been under the spotlight for allegations of conservative bias several times, it’s understandable why those who share the political slant of the coverage are those who favour the channel the most. Considering this, it is also understandable to see why those who are most likely to vote for Romney in 2012 are those who would be least likely to know about his ever-changing stance on important issues. Ironically, the Presidential Candidate for the Democratic party in 2004, John Kerry, was hounded for being an apparent flip flopper in his race against George W Bush. And more revealing still is how Fox News has absolutely no mention of Romney’s same crime. It’s easy to see how this withholding of information in order to make your chosen candidate appear the superior is the perfect breeding ground for an uninformed and unfair election – with the American electorate paying the biggest price for it.

I might find BBC News, Sky News, ITV News and all the rest slightly cold and stoic in comparison to their American counterparts. But in order to have a more intelligent and informed debate about who’ll lead my country in the years to come, I’m willing to sacrifice a bit of showmanship in my news coverage. And in order to truly understand the American political landscape, you must understand that Romney’s hopes of entering the White House rest largely on a ‘free’ press. A press free to say whatever the fuck it wants.

 

Paul Zollo Interview

Paul Zollo is an acclaimed songwriter, writer and photographer. Having interviewed some of the biggest and best names in music and writing one of the premier books on songwriting, and amidst numerous musical, writing and photography pursuits, he took the time to answer some of our questions about his career so far.

Tell us a little about yourself

Born in Chicago, raised in Wilmette, Illinois, went to Boston University in the great city of Boston. I love music, Charlie Chaplin, riding my bike. Have lived in Los Angeles since 1982 and I love it. Am married to Leslie Diller Zollo, who is an artist, and we have one child – our son Joshua Zollo. We also have six cats.

You are both an accomplished writer and musician; your band The Ghosters was named The Best Unsigned Band in Los Angeles in 1993 and you have since recorded solo albums including a duet with Art Garfunkel. Would you say you are a musician or writer first and foremost, and why?

I am a songwriter. Writing songs – and singing and recording them – is the most important thing in my life. That being said, I love the other work I do – writing and photography. It’s all part of the same thing, creative
expression, and all creative work, I find, leads me to do more. Taking pictures is great for my songwriting, and it’s a joy. So I’m happy doing all of it, but nothing matters more to me than songwriting.

Did you always have ambitions in music and writing, or has it just turned out that way for you?

Since the summer I turned 11, all I ever wanted was to be a singer-songwriter. I wrote my first song that summer of 1969, and never stopped. At that time songwriting seemed like the most fun and the most magical pursuit there is. Prior to that I liked the idea of being an astronaut – primarily for the weightlessness in outer space, which seemed like a lot of fun. But I got over that. And to this day I love songwriting with the same passion I had then, and I’m really glad I am still a songwriter, that I didn’t lose that somewhere.  I became a music writer when I moved to L.A. in 1982 just to pay my bills and try to afford being a musician. I had done some journalistic writing before then, in college. Did an interview with Woody Guthrie’s wife Marjorie Guthrie in college, just so I could meet her. I went to work for her in NYC right after college, but just briefly, and mostly so I could be with Woody’s notebooks and crayons and pencils. Marjorie was a wonderful lady, and I was so happy to get to know her.

First job in L.A. was in a Hollywood recording studio first and while there I got my first stories published. Also had a job writing radio dramas and radio documentaries, sort of. In ’87 the National Academy of Songwriters in the heart of Hollywood hired me to be editor of what was a newsletter then, a calendar of events. It was called SongTalk. It was on newsprint and with few ads – so we had a lot of space to do stories. The director of NAS was a great guy named Kevin Odegard, a musician who performed with Dylan, and a man of real vision. He had somehow invited many of the world’s greatest songwriters to become Gold
members and donate money.

So I asked him if we could invite these people – people such as Paul Simon, Randy Newman, Prince, Burt Bacharach – to do interviews. He said I could try. So I did, and for my first issue I had Frank Zappa! Also Livingston & Evans, the legendary writers of “Que Sera” and “Silver Bells” and other great songs.

And it went from there. My second issue had Randy Newman, who I adore and am proud to say has become a friend. I have interviewed him many times since then. But that first one – we connected well cause I know his work so well, inside and out, and so revere him – it became a wonderful interview, to this day one of the best I’ve ever done. The industry really noticed it. It put us on the map. And from there I interviewed so many legends of songwriting – Paul Simon,  Bob Dylan, Leonard Cohen, Harry Nilsson, Pete Seeger, Sammy Cahn, Willie Dixon, Laura Nyro.

The list goes on. And it’s an intentionally diverse list, in terms of genre and generation, because the ruling idea was always based on Pete Seeger’s quote to me, “Songwriters are links in a chain.” The understanding that although the industry segregates songwriters into separate genres and separate bins – so as to market them – that all songwriters are connected, building on the work of what came before. That regardless of genre or era, all these people are doing the same thing – combining language and music to create songs. From the start I always intended to collect these interviews into a book. Songwriters On Songwriting was an idea I had for many years before it was realized, and then it was published in a small version with Writer’s Digest books before first before being expanded and then again by Da Capo Books, NYC.

One look at your accomplishments in the past 20 years and people could consider you one of the most prolific creative people ever, with envious achievements in many fields – the ability to work with Art Garfunkel in one area and then compile a book with interviews of such people as Paul Simon and Neil Young in Songwriters on Songwriting is not something most
people have the fortune to do. What do you think it is that has enabled you to accomplish these things, beyond hard work?

That’s very kind of you to say. The only answer is persistence.  And hard work, yes.  I’m glad from your perspective it seems like a chain of unbroken accomplishments, whereas I’m very aware, of course, of all the things that didn’t work out, the interviews I didn’t get, the duets I wasn’t able to sing. But it is very rewarding to see the work expand – and to matter – after all these years.

In terms of getting great interviews, hard work and persistence both paid off in that I always worked hard on each interview, doing an intense amount of research into the work and wisdom of each songwriter. So that when I went into each interview, the subject knew of my knowledge of and reverence for their work, and that elevated the conversations. Some songwriters, like Paul Simon and Laura Nyro, I knew their work from a lifetime of knowing and studying their work inside out. But it took me years to convince either to do an interview. But when Simon did, we really connected – and we continued the interview in NY and L.A. at first – and then he invited me to write liner notes for his first boxed set in 1994 – and so I got to know him, and interview him many times. I just interviewed him last year for his most recent album.
I also had the remarkable experience of playing him some of my songs, in his apartment, a few years back. He was pretty critical!

Similarly with the great Laura Nyro, one of the world’s most inspirational and beautiful artists, she resisted for a long time – I think because she was afraid my question would be “What happened to you – you used to be so great?!” Whereas my questions were “How did you write that song? It is a miracle.” And so when she realized how much I loved her, and how well I knew her work, we had an amazing talk, and she used parts of it for her song book and her boxed set as well. So it was hard work that led to the interviews becoming as good as they could be – Tom Petty said I would come “ridiculously prepared” which I liked
– and that, in turn, led to other great songwriters knowing I would do a good job, and consenting to do an interview.

As for dueting with Art Garfunkel, that was a dream come true unlike anything ever in my life. I got to know Artie from interviewing him several times, and not only is he one of the planet’s greatest singers – a genius
with harmony singing, really – he’s a very very smart man, very funny, a poet. He’s more than most people know, I think. And he very kindly agreed to do the duet with me – and did it in Hollywood at the studio on Hollywood Boulevard where I was recording. And he could have done the whole thing fast and be done in 30 minutes. Instead he spent four hours working on it, crafting harmony parts for each verse. He brought
such love to it, it blew me away. To this day when I hear it, it just kills me. It’s on my song “Being In This World,” a song influenced by the beautiful  books of John Fante. And Artie’s part on it is so beautiful.
I am presently working on a new album, my first for Trough Records, to be called Universal Cure. It will be out in October of this year. And happy to say the great Terre Roche – of the Roches – sings a duet on my song “Maggie.” Terre actually sang with Paul Simon a few times too and also on Robert Fripp’s Exposure. And she did a gorgeous job on this. Like Artie, she’s just one of those miracle harmony singers. And also a very sweet, generous person – who put a lot of time into it.

Also I have Tomas Ulrich on cello on that song – he is a brilliant cellist, called ‘the Miles Davis of cello’ – he also played on the song with Artie. And fantastic musicians throughout like Mike Baird, Bob Malone, Billy
Salisbury, Aaron Wolfson, Chad Watson, and beautiful harmonies by the very great Earl Grey and Lisa Johnson, who are currently in The Zollo Band.

Songwriters on Songwriting has been called “the ultimate book about songwriting” and is used as a textbook in courses in such universities as UCLA and Berklee. What gave you the idea to write such a book?

To be honest, the first idea came from a book by Bill Flanagan called Written In My Soul. A book of interviews with songwriters.  Bill used to be editor of Musician magazine – and thanks to him I used to do a lot of
writing for Musician, which was a thrill as it was one of the best American music mags ever. Bill went onto VH-1 and other great stuff – a very fine writer and thinker. But not a songwriter, so his interviews didn’t get
into the depth of songwriting process I yearned for. So when I got the job as editor of SongTalk, I made a big list of all the songwriters I wanted to interview. Some, as mentioned, were already Gold members of NAS Many great songwriters were not – but through my work, many of them joined, such as Yoko Ono, who after I did a cover story on became a member – and also donated a lot of money. Of all these people, Yoko remains perhaps the most generous.  I’d say she is the most misunderstood songwriter I have ever met. People ascribe dark motives to her life and history – which is so so far from the truth. John Lennon loved her with good reason!
So I made this big list and very gradually – over about 10 years in that job – I interviewed many on my list. Writer’s Digest books of Cincinnati asked me to do a book for them called The Beginning Songwriter’s Answer Book. I agreed to do it if they would do Songwriters On Songwriting. Which they did. So I did the first version of the book with them, a pretty small version, with only about 20 interviews. Subsequently, I signed with Da Capo Books in New York to do a new version of it, and following that we did another expanded version which came out in 2000. I did interview most of the songwriters on my list – but there are still a few I have yet to interview, despite much trying over the years  – so the work goes on. I am Senior Editor with American Songwriter mag right now – and my own web magazine is Bluerailroad (www.bluerailroad.com) where the work is published until being in the next volume.

You have been fortunate enough to interview such prestigious and influential songwriters as Frank Zappa, Bob Dylan and Tom Petty. How did you decide who to approach for interviewing and what prompted this venture?

I approached those songwriters who influenced and impacted my own life. And then those who I didn’t know as well personally but I know they had been impactful over the years. My main criteria was and is to celebrate those songwriters who have written work which lasts, work which has sustained over the years. If you write one song like that which lasts – which matters, which people love even after the season of its arrival – that is important. And if you have done that many times, as have all of these songwriters, it’s miraculous, really. I happen to love a lot of music – I love Pete Seeger and Frank Zappa and Dylan and Brubeck – and Sinatra – there’s a big range, and as I said, it’s all connected by this singular pursuit of songwriting. Then as editor of SongTalk – and from there I was with Performing Songwriter mag for a while and now American Songwriter mag – I got pitched a lot of stuff from record companies. So in addition to all these stories with legendary songwriters in my book, I have done countless stories on bands and songwriters that most people never heard of, or didn’t last. A lot of people I wrote about I did think would last – and have been surprised sometimes by which careers spark and soar – and which ones don’t.
I met and wrote about a lot of famous songwriters long before they became known – such as Jewel, Tori Amos, Katy Perry, Joan Osborne, Siedah Garrett, Alanis Morissette, Glen Ballard – and it’s been fascinating to see which ones become big – some huge – and some not at all. So I’ve written many more stories and interviews than the ones which are in the book. For that, I had to choose what I considered the most influential
and impactful of all these songwriters.

Have you interviewed everyone you have tried to talk to, or have you suffered many rejections?

No, I have not interviewed everyone I would like to. Not close. There are several which have been on the top of the list for years, but for whatever reason, it’s been impossible to ever arrange an interview. Sometimes it is all set and then is cancelled. It’s frustrating and I don’t like to linger on it. That being said, it is a great joy when I finally get to interview someone I have wanted to for many years. It is hardly ever the songwriter themselves who has anything to do with it – it’s their gate-keepers – managers and publicists. But I never give up. Very happy to say I interviewed Chrissie Hynde – took me forever – and also Patti Smith recently. Both brilliant people and great interviews – but took forever. Also Leiber & Stoller  – and recently Don McLean!  Also James Taylor, Stephen Stills, John Mellencamp. And the very great Matisyahu, who I adore.
So the others I won’t name here, but I won’t give up on trying – cause I want them in Songwriters On Songwriting, Vol. II.

Songwriters… in particular has been expanded a few times already, and you have since interviewed more people. Do you think there will ever be a final version, or will you keep updating it for as long as musicians agree to share their opinions with you?

We updated it as much as we could – just over 700 pages. So now as mentioned I’m working on Volume II, which has been in the works for some time.  When that is done, that will be it. I do have other books  I am working on.

Of all the people you have interviewed, who was your favourite – for whatever reason – and is there anyone on your wish list for a future interview or collaboration?

I truly can’t name just one.  So many amazing experiences for me. I have so idolized, admired and respected these folks for so long, it’s a thrill unlike any other to be able to sit down with them and ask questions. Dylan was maybe the most exciting of all – but Paul Simon was amazing, as was Leonard Cohen and not to mention Zappa, Pete Seeger. Randy. Becker & Fagen. Going into John and Yoko’s home to talk to Yoko at the Dakota, wow. Driving around the hills of L.A. with Harry Nilsson listening to demos of him and Lennon. I could go on and on. All of these have been very meaningful and extraordinary; I’ve tried to get that across in the intros, the texture of those times. In my Dylan intro I put it in terms I was thinking in, seeing Bob Dylan’s guitar, Bob Dylan’s moccasins. And sitting there with him – as I wrote – to me it felt not unlike sitting with Shakespeare, knowing the impact and breadth of this one man’s work on our lives, our culture, our history.

The two main names on my list I have been trying to set to forever is Joni Mitchell, Stevie Wonder and Bruce Springsteen.  Make that three names! I have met all of them – and Joni even agreed at one point to do an interview – and I am a thorough expert on all three, and would SO love the chance – also Paul McCartney. Four! McCartney too I have met – and have tried hard for a real interview for a long time – so the pursuit persists. I never give up.

Your writing extends beyond talking about songs and musicians, and aside from your editor roles for magazines and your contributions to such magazines as Rolling Stone and Variety, you have also written a novel entitled Sunset and Cahuenga. Do you have any plans for more novels, or books that deviate from your passion for music?

Sunset & Cahuenga is a novel based on my true – and truly crazy – experience working in a Hollywood recording studio at that title location in the 80s. Not sure I’ll ever write another novel again. It remains unpublished.

I also wrote Hollywood Remembered, which is an oral and narrative history of Hollywood – and more. I love Hollywood and its history – and so this was mostly a non-musical book – although I have chapters on Else Blangsted – who was a legendary music editor for films, as well as David Raksin, who was a great film composer and worked with Chaplin.

I do have plans for several more books that are musical – which isn’t the question I know – but similar to the book I did with Tom Petty, Conversations with Tom Petty, I am planning to do similar books with Paul
Simon, Randy Newman, Rickie Lee Jones, John Hiatt.  These books are kind of under-way in that I have interviewed each several times; I could put out a Simon book now, but won’t yet.

Also working on a documentary about John Prine presently which will be very great – and hoping to do a book with him as well. For a long time  – six years now – I have been working on a book of my
photographic portraits which will be called Angeleno. It will have portraits of every kind of person who lives here, which is every kind of person alive, really – the very rich and famous, the homeless, and everyone
inbetween. I have yet to get a publishing deal for this one, but I am dedicated to this book being what I want it to be, and though it’s not yet in the world, I can see that it will be. And I am excited by it.

In addition to your music and writing, your photography has been displayed at galleries in New York and Los Angeles, you have photographed more celebrities than most people could mention, and you are working on a photograph book now. How do you find the time to do so much work in multiple areas?

Well, I don’t have a daily commute, and I don’t talk on the phone much. So there is a lot of time in each day, and as the years pass, the work accumulates and it seems the artist has been working all the time! People
think this about Woody Allen, because he’s so prolific. A movie every year. But as he always explains, that leaves him plenty of time to go to a basketball game, or out for dinner or a movie. It’s just about dedication,
about keeping it going. I wish I was more productive, and am endlessly aware of what I haven’t finished or accomplished. There’s a long way to go. But I am very happy that it appears that I am doing a superhuman amount of work. I’m not, really.

What music, books and photography does Paul Zollo enjoy on his downtime, when not creating his own projects?

I read mostly non-fiction, and for about the last seven months,  I read only books about Elvis. Both because I was writing a song about him (“Elvis in Aurora”) but also because I get obsessed with certain subjects, and want to read everything I can. Of which Peter Guralick’s two books on Elvis were by far the best, great books.

Right now I am reading Miles Davis’ autobiography and really enjoying it. I’ve been reading poetry by Phillip Larkin also. My son got me a book on the making of The Wizard of Oz for Father’s Day which I loved, it was great.

Musically I am really into Matisyahu right now – I think he’s doing things nobody else is doing – and his work is just extraordinary. I interviewed him again for the second time recently – and have seen him in concert a few times – and I adore everything about what he does. His new album is Sparkseeker with the song “Sunshine” for his son, which is my favorite song of this summer of 2012.

I’ve also been listening a lot to Warren Zevon. Met him but never interviewed him, and have gone through a true obsession with his music. Just can’t get enough of it. Through every chapter of his career, his songs were so strong and great. And in that place where I like to write, his content is unexpected and delightful. Writing songs nobody else ever wrote – about stuff nobody else touched – which to me is the ultimate. I tire of music eventually, and yet I find I do not tire of his songs – I always love them and want to hear them. My son, too, he loves Zevon. And also Matis.

Really loved Amy Winehouse – and also Mark Ronson, who produced her – his two albums are two of my favorite albums ever.

Listening to a lot of John Prine too, as I am working on a movie about him. And always in my iPod are my faves – Dylan, Simon, Rickie Lee Jones, Randy Newman, Beck, Pretenders, Mose Allison. Steely Dan for sure. LOVE Steely Dan. And many more. Just reviewed a new album by Robert Morgan Fisher – Notes For a Novel – that is very great.

Photographically – I have always loved Diane Arbus – and have been very inspired and motivated by her approach and ideas and her work. I also really love Robert Frank and Weegee.

If you had to pick just one creative outlet for the rest of your life, what would you choose and why?

Songwriting. Nothing to me is more captivating, inspiring and exciting than writing songs. Photography is a very close second.  Songwriting is harder for me – it takes way more brain and heart and soul. It takes a lot. But to write a song that you love, that you feel is great, that you want to sing every time you perform, nothing’s better than that.  Nothing moves me as much in my life as music – songs, primarily – that great intersection of words and music. So to be a part of that world – that’s all I’ve ever wanted – and I have no doubt I’ll be writing songs for my whole life. I sure hope so.

Book Review: Britpop, Cool Britannia and the Spectacular Demise of English Rock

“Something has shifted, theres a new feeling on the streets. Theres a desire for change. Britain is exporting pop music again. Now all we need is a new government.”

Alistair Campbell
Tony Blair’s Press Secretary, Autumn 1996

If there was ever a quote that epitomised the time John Harris writes about, it’s this one. Britpop for those of you who don’t know is the name given to the period in the 1990s in which British music, politics and culture went through a perceived revolution, resuming its apparent dominance and international prestige. Mostly used in a musical context, the striking thing about the word ‘Britpop’ is that it can be applied to anything from Oasis to the Spice Girls – so certainly not a genre then (although John Harris focuses specifically on Britpop as rock music). Unlike other socio-cultural movements like punk, Britpop as a concept was much more successful. The fact it helped carry a new Labour government to election victory is a testament to that. And it’s traits like that that make Britpop such brilliant subject matter for a book.

First of all I’d like to say I’m hardly a bookworm. Having not read a book in over five years and with the only books I’d ever read page-to-page being the Harry Potter series, it’s not hard to imagine how close I fit the average reading activity of someone my age. It was first and foremost my interest not only in non-fiction but music in general that inspired my purchase, anybody feeling interested in either of the latter should follow suit. Fundamentally, it’s Harris’s ability to create a story of immense detail and insight that borders on the academic while simultaneously forging a read that really feels like a book about rock stars and the mindless fun that comes with it that makes it so successful. From studio to stadium, it’s rock n’ roll storytelling of some of the greatest bands of the era (Oasis, Blur, Pulp, Suede, Elastica) and the conflict, relationships and scene that enveloped around them is one of the most interesting times in our music history, and whilst previously writing for publications as NME, Q, Select, Melody Maker as well as a healthy selection of the mainstream press, this veteran writer does the period complete justice.

Okay, so until now I’ve never actually read a “proper” book. So perhaps you’d see this as nothing more than a proud statement of my literary accomplishment. But perhaps the fact I finished this one, and that it has spurred me on to read more says more about the book than it does me.

A truly thrilling read.

‘Lovestruck’ – The be all and end all

All around you you will see love. In the street, on the television, at the airport or even in the cafe.  We just love to love. The way it makes us feel and think. Is there a reason that we are all addicted to love? Like a drug that is never made illegal. We just cannot seem to help ourselves. We stumble through life on the look out for that one person to complete us.

Through tears and sorrow we rise up and get back out there. Usually going through the whole damned experience again. But why do we constantly feel the need to break our own hearts time and time again. Are we genetically crafted to feel hurt until we find ‘the one’?

Whilst we all have our lives to lead and jobs to do, love will always be there. Waiting in the shadows, a constant reminder that we will one day need to hunt. Hunt for the commitment of another. Is it the be all and end all? Well yes. If we are to survive, we have to create. Whether that be in a loving relationship or not we are genetically programmed to reproduce. With that will come love. The love of a child.

Love is all around, without it in some for another we would be weak. After all in our deepest darkest moments, someone somewhere in some form loves us. A partner, child or friend. Love is the be all and end all.

Lady Gaga announces new album for 2013

Lady Gaga has confirmed that her new album will drop in early 2013.

The singer who is due to officially announce her next studio album this September, has told fans on her newly-launched social network Little Monsters that her new album will be in stores “before spring”.

The star recently debuted a new track ‘Princess Die’ during one of her ‘Born This Way Ball’ shows in Australia presumably of the new album.

Meanwhile, Gaga is set to make her movie debut in Machete Kills by Robert Rodriguez.